Curated

Bad Ideas, Made Carefully

A small experimental cocktail room hidden inside The Spiffy Dapper that begins with bad ideas and does the work required to find the one that was secretly good.

Anon NonaDecember 11, 202512 min read
A dim, intimate cocktail bar with jars of strange infusions lining the back shelf

Editor's note: Oriental Elixir is operated by the publisher of this site. The review was written under the same anonymous-reviewer policy as the rest of the publication.

Oriental Elixir sounds like the sort of bar that should have collapsed under its own nonsense years ago. A hidden experimental cocktail room. Daily-changing menu. Bespoke drinks. Asian ingredients. Tanglin Gin infusions. Strange bottles. Stranger flavours. No obvious interest in being normal. At various points the back shelf has held octopus gin, blue cheese, rosemary chilli, Thai smoked beef, laksa leaf, Hon-Shimeji infused for a week in Tanglin Orchid Gin, kangaroo jerky, marmite, tteokbokki syrup, Song Fa bak kut teh cordial, ghost pepper bitters, dried shrimp, and a Sichuan-peppercorn bitters that the bartender pulls from a small dark bottle without making a show of it. That list should either make me curious or make me leave immediately. Both reactions are reasonable.

This is the problem with Oriental Elixir. It is very easy to describe it in a way that makes it sound stupid. That may also be the point.

Stupid as a method

A lot of bars become stupid by accident. Oriental Elixir seems to have chosen stupidity as a working method, then kept asking whether the stupid thing could be made delicious. This is more interesting than ordinary cleverness. Clever bars often protect themselves. They make drinks that sound good on paper, photograph well, and remain safely within the zone of plausible praise. Oriental Elixir appears more willing to make drinks that sound indefensible until the first sip does, or does not, defend them. That is a useful kind of danger.

The current iteration is hidden inside The Spiffy Dapper at 294 River Valley Road. Both bars are run by Abhishek Cherian George, who founded Oriental Elixir at 10 Haji Lane in December 2019, briefly ran it out of a second-floor space at 19A Bukit Pasoh Road, and has now consolidated the concept into a bar-in-a-bar within his older Spiffy Dapper shophouse. Tanglin Gin is the house base spirit. The format is bespoke. The price is twenty-five dollars net per cocktail, fixed.

That move into Spiffy Dapper matters. Oriental Elixir began life more as a secret Haji Lane thing, tucked behind a stairwell next to Bergs Burgers, the kind of room people found by climbing stairs and trusting the story enough to keep going. The hidden-bar part is less interesting now. Singapore has exhausted hidden bars. We have hidden bars behind restaurants, hidden bars behind curtains, hidden bars behind coffee shops, hidden bars behind signs, hidden bars so well documented that the only thing hidden is why anyone still calls them hidden. Secrecy is no longer a concept. It is a floor plan.

Oriental Elixir's hiding place only matters because the drinks behave like they need somewhere to hide, and that is different. The bar is not secret because it wants to feel exclusive. It feels secret because some of the ideas sound like they should be tested away from the public until someone knows whether they are legal. Octopus gin is not a mainstream hospitality proposition. A blue cheese curry Negroni is not a crowd-pleaser. Bak kwa as a Negroni base is not a sentence that should reassure investors.

And yet these are exactly the sort of ideas a serious drinking city needs. Not because they are all good. They cannot all be good. That would be impossible, and also boring. They matter because they give the scene permission to fail differently. Singapore cocktail bars are often too good at being good. The ice is good. The lighting is good. The menu design is good. The descriptions are good. The service is good. The drink is good. The result is good in a way that makes me want to misbehave slightly just to check whether the room is alive. Oriental Elixir does not have that problem. It misbehaves first.

What the experiment has to do

The danger, of course, is obvious. Experimental bars can become self-indulgent very quickly. The bartender has an idea. The idea becomes an infusion. The infusion becomes a drink. The drink becomes a story. The story becomes the reason nobody admits the drink tastes strange in the wrong way. Everyone politely discusses ambition while privately wishing for a Daiquiri.

This is the central Oriental Elixir test. Does the experiment become a drink, rather than a conversation piece or a dare or a joke or a flex? A drink is the only thing that counts.

Recognition is not enough.

I ordered a bak kwa Negroni because the name sounded like a dare. The bartender did not flinch. The drink looked Negroni-coloured, slightly darker on the edges, a small piece of bak kwa speared on a pick to one side of the glass. The first sip was the test. The smoke and fat sat under the Campari, not on top of it. The sweetness of the cured meat did not fight the vermouth. The drink was still recognisably a Negroni, bitter and round and cold, but the bitter had been deepened by something charred and slightly animal. By the second sip I had stopped looking for the bak kwa as a separate note. It was just the version of Negroni this bar made. That is the only verdict that counts in a room like this.

A bak kwa Negroni is a very funny idea until it arrives. Then it has to perform. The smoke, fat, sweetness, salt and cured-meat memory have to deepen the Negroni rather than merely announce "bak kwa" to the nose. The Johnny, the bar's longest-running documented signature, kangaroo jerky-infused Tanglin Orchid Gin with Song Fa bak kut teh cordial, laksa leaves and Burma Tonic, named for a resident bartender, has to suggest herbal broth and savoury depth without becoming soup with alcohol. The shimeji gin has to taste like mushroom rather than damp. Recognition is not enough.

That is the mistake many local-flavour cocktails make. They point at something familiar and expect me to reward the pointing. Oriental Elixir's best version is harsher than that. It does not ask, "Do you recognise this?" It asks, "Can this thing survive being translated into alcohol?" Sometimes the answer should be no, and that is important.

A bar like Oriental Elixir only makes sense if failure remains possible. If every idea is smoothed into acceptability, the room loses its reason to exist. The point of an R&D bar is that it lets the strange thing stay strange long enough to find out whether the strangeness has value. I should feel some risk. Not danger, exactly. More like the useful uncertainty of ordering something that might be brilliant, might be wrong, and might be wrong in an interesting way. That is a rare feeling in Singapore.

We are not always kind to failure. We prefer proof, polish, certification, rankings, consensus, operational competence. Bars respond accordingly. They arrive finished. They speak clearly. They minimise ambiguity. They show me what kind of experience is being purchased. Oriental Elixir seems less finished by design.

The daily-changing menu matters for this reason. A static experimental bar becomes a contradiction. Once the experiment is stable, it is no longer really an experiment. The menu has to keep moving, not as novelty theatre, but because the room's identity depends on the bartender still asking bad questions with enough seriousness to get good answers.

Strangeness needs hospitality

This is also why bespoke service makes sense here. In many bars, bespoke service is just menu avoidance. The bartender asks what you like, you say "not too sweet," everyone pretends that means something, and a pleasant sour appears. Oriental Elixir's bespoke format has more purpose because the back bar itself is unstable. The question is not only what spirit, what sweetness, what citrus. The question is how far the guest wants to go. There is hospitality in that.

The bartender, Abhishek himself on the night, working alongside Sue at the small back counter, runs the bespoke conversation in two questions: base spirit, and how far the guest wants to go. Refreshing or weird? Familiar or strange? The questions are short. The answers are taken at face value. No follow-up questionnaire. No therapy.

A good bartender in this room has to read appetite and fear at the same time. Some guests want octopus gin because they came to be challenged. Some want to hear about octopus gin, admire its existence, and then drink something much safer. Some want a strange drink but not a stupid one. Some think they are adventurous until the words "blue cheese" enter the conversation. That reading is the real craft.

The infusions get the attention, but the human calibration is what makes the bar work. Strange ingredients do not excuse bad hosting. If anything, they require better hosting. I have to be made to feel safe enough to take a risk and free enough to refuse one. That is delicate. Push too hard and the bar becomes a dare. Play too safe and the bar becomes decorative weirdness.

The room's old laboratory reputation helps because it sets the expectation correctly: off-kilter infusions including blue cheese, rosemary chilli, Thai smoked beef and octopus, and a playlist that lifts from old field recordings and trade-route folk music more than from contemporary bar Spotify. That is absurd. It is also coherent.

The bar is not only about ingredients. It is about archaeology, in the loosest possible sense: digging through flavours, regions, sounds, old trade routes, ugly memories, street food, soups, snacks, herbs, meat, funk, and the parts of Asian drinking culture that do not fit cleanly into the classic cocktail canon. The question is not whether everything belongs in a cocktail. It obviously does not. The question is whether the canon is too narrow to begin with. Oriental Elixir's answer is yes.

It behaves as if almost anything might belong in a glass if handled with enough disrespect and enough care. That combination is important. Respect alone would make the drinks solemn. Disrespect alone would make them stupid. The bar needs both: respect for flavour, disrespect for category.

This is where it sits apart from more polished Singapore bars. Native looks at the region through ecology, sourcing, fermentation and method. The Elephant Room looks at Little India through cultural specificity and translation. Nutmeg & Clove looks at Singapore through memory, humour and national language. Oriental Elixir is rougher than all of them. It is less interested in explaining the culture and more interested in putting the culture through a still, a jar, or a questionable gin infusion until something happens. That makes it less elegant. Good.

Not every bar should be elegant. Elegance is often a way of making difficult flavours behave. Oriental Elixir is more useful when it lets them misbehave a little. A curry note should not be too polite. A cured-meat note should not vanish into "umami." A soup memory should not become generic herbaceousness. If the drink is going to invoke food, it should carry some of food's vulgarity with it.

This is why the bar can be polarising. Some people will find it brilliant. Some will find it too weird. Some will say the drinks are mind-blowing. Others will wonder why anyone worked so hard to avoid making a normal drink. Both positions are fair.

Oriental Elixir is not a neutral room. I do not go there when I want a perfect classic made with quiet authority. It is a shaky first-date bar unless both people have a healthy relationship with uncertainty. Anyone who believes cocktails should remain inside inherited Western forms will be unhappy, and so will anyone who thinks adventurousness is a personality but cannot handle being challenged by a glass.

The bar asks for complicity. I have to agree to the experiment. Not fully. Not blindly. But enough. I have to accept that the first description may sound wrong. I have to let the bartender guide me. I have to be willing to laugh if the drink sounds ridiculous and then take it seriously if it is good. That is the fun.

R&D with a drinking problem

Oriental Elixir's weakness is the same as its strength: it can sound like a gimmick. The public descriptions almost invite that reading. Exotic infusions. Hidden bar. Strange flavours. Daily menu. Cabinet of curiosities. These are very marketable details, and marketable details can cheapen a good thing if they become the reason people come.

The bar has to resist becoming a freak show. The strange drink should not be ordered only because it is strange. The bartender should not perform weirdness for applause. The menu should not escalate toward absurdity simply because absurdity sells. Once the question becomes "what is the craziest thing we can put in gin?", the room is dead. The better question is smaller and more serious: what flavour has not yet been given a fair chance in this form? That is the more durable project.

It explains why Oriental Elixir still feels relevant even as more sophisticated bars have entered the Asian-ingredient conversation. Sophistication is not the same as exploration. Some bars refine. Oriental Elixir digs. Some bars curate. Oriental Elixir rummages. Some bars translate culture into polished liquid statements. Oriental Elixir seems more likely to hold up a jar and say, unfortunately, this might work. There is real hospitality in that kind of optimism.

The current River Valley iteration, bar-in-a-bar inside Spiffy Dapper, gives the concept a slightly different emotional frame from the old Haji Lane years. It is less mythic now, less tied to the early hidden-stairwell thrill, and perhaps more directly what it always wanted to be: a small experimental cocktail room for people who still believe drinking can produce surprise.

The bar has also begun productising its R&D. The bottled retail line, Chrysanthemum, Jackfruit, Durian (the brand's own materials describe Durian as their "most controversial release"), and a twenty-five-bottle limited Sampaguita, has taken the bar's infusion logic and made it portable. That is a structural pivot most R&D bars never make. The bar is no longer only a place to drink the experiments. It is increasingly a place where the experiments are bottled. Whether the R&D personality survives that productisation is the next question.

The kinship is worth naming, too. Abhishek's other current venue, Sago House, co-founded with Desiree Jane Silva and Jay Gray, sits at the polished end of the Singapore bar scene, the room built for consistency, the room that earns the kind of reputation that travels. Oriental Elixir is the rougher sibling, with no such ambition and no apparent interest in chasing it. The contrast is the cleanest evidence that the experimental room is run as an R&D project rather than as a brand-extension play.

Surprise is underrated. Not shock. Shock is cheap. Surprise is harder because it has to resolve. I expect the drink to fail, and then it does not. Or I expect a novelty and get balance. Or I think I hate savoury drinks and discover one that makes sense. Or the bartender takes a familiar flavour and makes it newly useful. That is what Oriental Elixir is for.

It should not be too clean. It should not be too safe. It should not be too pleased with itself either. The room only works if the experiments are disciplined by pleasure. The weirdness must serve the drink, not the other way around. But when that happens, the bar does something genuinely valuable. It expands the possible. Not in a grand manifesto way, but in a dumb, practical, glass-in-hand way. It says that octopus might belong in gin. That bak kwa might deepen a Negroni. That bak kut teh might have a cocktail shadow. That blue cheese might have a use beyond frightening normal people. That Asian ingredients do not always need to be made elegant before they are allowed into serious drinking.

Some of these ideas are bad. Thank God. A bar with only good ideas is usually lying. Oriental Elixir's best quality is that it seems willing to begin with bad ideas and then do the work required to find the one that was secretly good. That is not madness. That is R&D with a drinking problem.

Bad Ideas, Made Carefully — Curated